🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub Black history and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.